Spelling Sensitivity in Russian Speakers Develops by Early Adolescence
Scientists at the RAS Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology and HSE University have uncovered how the foundations of literacy develop in the brain. To achieve this, they compared error recognition processes across three age groups: children aged 8 to 10, early adolescents aged 11 to 14, and adults. The experiment revealed that a child's sensitivity to spelling errors first emerges in primary school and continues to develop well into the teenage years, at least until age 14. Before that age, children are less adept at recognising misspelled words compared to older teenagers and adults. The study findings have been published in Scientific Reports.
By the time they finish primary school, children's reading of high-frequency words becomes automated. Behavioural studies measuring parameters like reaction time and error rates show that children at this age can reliably distinguish between words and letter strings resembling words.
The event-related potential (ERP) method is a promising approach to examining the reading process in neurophysiological research. Event-related potentials are the brain's electrophysiological responses to perceptual events (such as specific sensations), cognitive events (like decision-making), or motor events (such as pressing a button).
The ERP method allows for assessing the brain's response to verbal stimuli and identifying time intervals—components within the ERP—associated with their processing. In primary school-age children, the ERPs in response to words and strings of non-letter symbols differ at 200 ms after presentation, but distinctions between words and meaningless strings of actual letters are detected much later, only after 400 ms. This indicates that such stimuli are more challenging for young children to process.
However, sensitivity to spelling patterns is not limited to the ability to distinguish words from meaningless letter sequences but also involves more complex skills related to recognizing spelling errors. The issue is that the neural bases underlying the development of orthographic sensitivity remain poorly understood.
Scientists at the RAS Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology and the Centre for Cognition and Decision Making of the HSE Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience used electroencephalography (EEG) to investigate event-related potentials associated with spelling error recognition. The study involved children aged 8 to 10, early adolescents aged 11 to 14, and adults aged 18 to 39, all of them native speakers of Russian. None of the subjects experienced spelling difficulties.
The subjects were presented with words on a screen, some of which were spelled correctly while others were misspelled. The task was to determine whether the word on the screen was spelled correctly.
The experiment showed that all the groups successfully identified both correctly spelled and misspelled words. The average error rate, even among children aged 8 to 10, did not exceed 14%, although children had more incorrect answers and longer reaction times compared to early adolescents and adults.
Early adolescents and adults showed similar, though not identical, behavioural results. The response time to both types of stimuli and the percentage of erroneous responses to correctly spelled words did not differ between these groups. However, early adolescents were worse than adults at recognising misspelled words.
In adult participants, differences in ERPs between correctly and incorrectly spelled words were observed in two distinct time windows. This indicates that the recognition of spelling correctness by adults involves two ERP components: an early component around 400 ms and a later one of up to 600 ms, probably related to re-checking the spelling for errors.
In children aged 8 to 10, there were no differences in ERPs between correctly spelled and misspelled words. According to the researchers, this suggests that the ability to quickly recognise correct spelling is just beginning to develop at this age. Interestingly, in early adolescents, spelling recognition was reflected only at the later stage corresponding to the 600 ms component, ie they did not exhibit early differences related to automated spelling recognition.
The experiment revealed that a child's orthographic sensitivity first emerges in primary school and continues to develop well into the teenage years, at least until age 14. These findings contribute to our understanding of the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the mastery of Russian spelling and how these mechanisms evolve with age.
Leading Research Fellow, Centre for Cognition and Decision Making, Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience
In our study, adults and adolescents did not differ in their reaction times to any of the stimuli: both groups recognized correctly and incorrectly spelled words at similar speeds. This suggests that they likely employed similar reading and spelling recognition strategies. Nevertheless, the percentage of misidentified misspelled words was higher in early adolescents compared to adults, suggesting that spelling sensitivity is still developing at this age.
See also:
Z-Flipons: How Specific DNA Regions Help Regulate Gene Function
Researchers at HSE University and InsideOutBio have applied machine learning to identify the location and functions of mirror-twisted DNA structures, known as Z-flipons, in human and mouse genomes. The scientists discovered which Z-DNA regions were conserved in both species throughout evolution and demonstrated for the first time that Z-DNA accelerates the process of creating RNA copies of genes. The findings will contribute to the development of new treatments for genetic diseases. The study has been published in Scientific Reports.
HSE Researchers Develop Python Library for Analysing Eye Movements
A research team at HSE University has developed EyeFeatures, a Python library for analysing and modelling eye movement data. This tool is designed to simplify the work of scientists and developers by enabling them to efficiently process complex data and create predictive models.
Scientists Identify Fifteen Key Motives Driving Human Behaviour
Researchers at HSE University and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine have identified 15 key motives that drive human behaviour. By analysing people's views, preferences, and actions through an evolutionary lens, they demonstrated how these motives intertwine to shape habits and interpersonal relationships. The findings have been published in Personality and Individual Differences.
HSE Neurolinguists Create Russian Adaptation of Classic Verbal Memory Test
Researchers at the HSE Centre for Language and Brain and Psychiatric Hospital No. 1 Named after N.A. Alexeev have developed a Russian-language adaptation of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test. This classic neuropsychological test evaluates various aspects of auditory verbal memory in adults and is widely used in both clinical diagnostics and research. The study findings have been published in The Clinical Neuropsychologist.
Tickling the Nerves: Why Crime Content is Popular
Consumers of content about serial killers watch and read it to experience intense emotions that are often lacking in everyday life and to understand the reasons that drive people to commit crimes. However, such content does not contribute to increased aggression. These conclusions were drawn by sociologists from HSE University. The results of their study have been published in Crime, Media, Culture: An International Journal.
HSE Researchers Prove the Existence of Nash Equilibrium for a New Class of Problems in Game Theory
Researchers at HSE University's St Petersburg School of Economics and Management have been exploring methods for the efficient allocation of resources in systems involving multiple players. The scientists have proven the existence of strategies for optimal decision-making in competition for limited, discrete resources in four different cases. The developed mathematical model can be applied in various fields, ranging from education and medicine to managing networks and computing power. The paper has been published in Games and Economic Behaviour.
Researchers at HSE Centre for Language and Brain Reveal Key Factors Determining Language Recovery in Patients After Brain Tumour Resection
Alina Minnigulova and Maria Khudyakova at the HSE Centre for Language and Brain have presented the latest research findings on the linguistic and neural mechanisms of language impairments and their progression in patients following neurosurgery. The scientists shared insights gained from over five years of research on the dynamics of language impairment and recovery.
Neuroscientists Reveal Anna Karenina Principle in Brain's Response to Persuasion
A team of researchers at HSE University investigated the neural mechanisms involved in how the brain processes persuasive messages. Using functional MRI, the researchers recorded how the participants' brains reacted to expert arguments about the harmful health effects of sugar consumption. The findings revealed that all unpersuaded individuals' brains responded to the messages in a similar manner, whereas each persuaded individual produced a unique neural response. This suggests that successful persuasive messages influence opinions in a highly individual manner, appearing to find a unique key to each person's brain. The study findings have been published in PNAS.
Russian Scientists Improve Water Purification Membranes Using Metal Ions
Researchers have proposed using polymer membranes modified with copper, zinc, and chromium metal ions for water purification. These polymers were used for the first time in water purification via electrodialysis. Copper-based membranes demonstrated record selectivity for monovalent ions, opening new possibilities for sustainable water recycling. The study has been published in the Journal of Membrane Science.
Independent Experts More Effective Than Collective Expertise in Decision-Making Under Uncertainty
A collaborative study by Sergey Stepanov, Associate Professor at the HSE Faculty of Economic Sciences, and experts from INSEAD Business School and NYU Shanghai, indicates that in making decisions under high uncertainty, where it is unclear which choice is superior, advice from independent experts may be more beneficial than a collective opinion from a group of experts. The study has been published in Games and Economic Behavior.